Gov. Kemp’s foster-care package starts moving in General Assembly

Gov. Brian Kemp

ATLANTA – Legislation that would close a loophole in Georgia law pertaining to sexual misconduct by a foster parent was introduced in the state House of Representatives this week.

House Bill 911, sponsored by Rep. Ed Setzler, R-Acworth, would add “improper  sexual contact” by a foster parent with a foster child to a section of the state code that deals with sexual misconduct by an employer with an employee.

Foster parents convicted of the most serious form of the offense could face  prison sentences of up to 25 years and fines of up to $100,000.

The bill is part of a legislative package Gov. Brian Kemp is pushing this year aimed at making it easier for Georgians to become foster parents. The package also would triple the state tax credit for foster parents from $2,000 to $6,000 and lower the age requirement for unmarried Georgians to become foster parents from 25 to 21.

Foster care is a priority issue both for the governor and First Lady Marty Kemp.

“This legislation closes a dangerous loophole and prohibits foster parents from engaging in improper sexual behavior with children in their care,” she said in a prepared statement. “Moving forward, we will continue to devote our efforts to protecting the most vulnerable in our state from sexual misconduct.”

Setzler’s bill is being cosponsored by Rep. Jodi Lott, R-Evans, one of Kemp’s floor leaders in the House.

General Assembly mulling follow-up hemp legislation

ATLANTA – Participants in Georgia’s newly legalized hemp business would have to carry a license when transporting the product or face arrest under legislation before the General Assembly.

House Bill 847 is a follow-up to a measure lawmakers adopted last year that allows hemp, a cousin of marijuana that does not get users high, to be grown, processed and possessed in Georgia. States have rushed into the hemp business in recent years to take advantage of its many commercial uses, including the manufacture of rope, textiles and CBD oil used to treat a variety of illnesses.

As the Georgia Department of Agriculture continues developing the rules that will govern the hemp program, one looming drawback is that police conducting a traffic stop who notice a bag of green leafy material can’t readily tell whether it’s marijuana or hemp.

The Georgia Bureau of Investigation has machines that can determine whether a substance has a THC content – the chemical that produces a high – of below 0.3%, the legal limit. But the machines and tests are expensive.

There is no chemical difference between hemp and marijuana, Deneen Kilcrease of the GBI’s Crime Lab said Wednesday during a House Agriculture & Consumer Affairs Committee hearing on the bill.

The House bill would resolve that dilemma by requiring anyone in possession of such leafy material stopped by law enforcement to produce a state-issued license for hemp.

“Law enforcement had trouble distinguishing whether the product was legal or illegal,” Kilcrease said. “The intent was to clear it up for law enforcement and prosecutors.”

But Rep. Scot Turner, R-Holly Springs, argued the law enforcement provision casts too wide a net.

“Is it fair to prosecute somebody for possession of something that’s not going to get them stoned?” he asked.

Rep. John Corbett, R-Lake Park, the bill’s chief sponsor, said Turner’s concerns would not be an issue as long as people transporting hemp have the proper documentation.

The committee did not vote on the bill. Several issues remain up in the air, including how much to charge for hemp licenses and whether to authorize private colleges in Georgia to conduct research on the cultivation and research of hemp or limit the program to University System of Georgia institutions.

Senate ag committee passes Right to Farm Act changes

ATLANTA – A bill supporters say would increase protections for Georgia farmers from nuisance lawsuits passed a state Senate committee Tuesday.

Dubbed the Georgia Right to Farm Act of 2020, the bill would make it more difficult for property owners living in areas zoned for agricultural use to sue nearby agricultural operations such as chicken house or pig farms for offensive smells or runoff from sludge lagoons.

“We’re just doing our job to protect the family farmers in Georgia,” said state Rep. Tom McCall, chairman of the House Agriculture & Consumer Affairs Committee. McCall sponsored the bill in the House, which passed it last year and sent it over to the Senate.

The bill essentially updates a law the General Assembly enacted during the 1980s. Supporters say farmers need greater protection against nuisance lawsuits than the current law provides because rapid suburbanization of Georgia means more non-farming homeowners are encroaching on farmland.

Under the new bill, property owners wishing to file a nuisance suit against an agricultural operation must be located within five miles of the source of the alleged nuisance. Lawsuits must be brought within two years after a nuisance occurs, down from four years under the current law.

Sen. Larry Walker III, R-Perry, put together the substitute version of the bill the Senate committee passed on Tuesday. He said he gathered feedback both from agribusiness organizations that supported the bill and environmental groups opposed to it.

“What we have before us is very strong protection for agribusiness that strikes a fair balance with property owners,” Walker said.

But Sen. Zahra Karinshak, D-Duluth, questioned the need for tighter restrictions on nuisance lawsuits, including reducing the statute of limitations on filing legal action. She tried unsuccessfully to amend the bill by changing the time limit back to four years.

On the other side of the debate, two amendments proposed by Sen. Bill Heath, R-Bremen, to reduce the statute of limitations further to one year and to shrink the five-mile radius for eligibility to file a nuisance suit to one mile also failed.

The committee passed the bill 6-3, voting along party lines. It now heads to the Senate Rules Committee, which will decide whether to pass it on to the full Senate.

Bill would ban locals from regulating short-term rentals

ATLANTA – Georgia cities and counties would be prohibited from regulating short-term rental properties under legislation that cleared a state House committee Tuesday.

With the advent of Airbnb and other vacation rental companies in recent years, short-term rentals have become a fast-growing industry. But with that growth has come a rise in complaints from neighbors about rowdy parties and absentee property owners running what essentially are small hotels in residential areas.

Some local governments have responded with tight restrictions banning short-term rentals from their communities.

Cities and counties can address such issues through nuisance ordinances and occupancy limits without banning short-term rentals altogether, Rep. Kasey Carpenter, R-Dalton, the bill’s chief sponsor, told members of the House Regulated Industries Committee.

“These bans and overregulation are an attack on private property rights,” he said.

Advocates for local governments oppose the bill as usurping their zoning powers under the Georgia Constitution.

Clint Mueller, legislative director for the Association County Commissioners of Georgia, said the state’s one-size-fits-all approach toward short-term rentals won’t work in a state as diverse as Georgia.

“What St. Simons does may be different than what they do in North Fulton or in the mountains,” he said.

Mueller said counties currently don’t even have a way to determine which properties are being used as short-term rentals.

“If there’s a violation, we don’t know who’s renting short term,” he said. “We can’t even set up a notification process under this bill.”

House Speaker Pro Tempore Jan Jones, R-Milton, one of three committee members who voted against the bill, said it offers no protection for homeowners who might move into a neighborhood expecting the quality of life that comes with living in a residential area only to find short-term rentals plopped into their midst.

“Are you concerned you’re changing the rules for millions of Georgians?” Jones asked Carpenter.

But Carpenter said his bill treats short-term rental properties the same as long-term rentals that already are permitted in many residential neighborhoods. The only exception is a carve-out provision for homeowners’ associations that ban short-term rentals in their covenants.

“To me, there’s not a lot of difference between a short-term rental and a long-term rental,” he said. “You have bad apples in both cases.”

The bill now heads to the House Rules Committee, which will decide whether to send it to the full House for a vote.

Georgia Power customers to see third bill credit from federal tax relief

ATLANTA – Georgia Power customers will get a break on their bills next month thanks to the tax reforms Congress enacted back in 2017.

The third of three bill credits associated with a reduction in the federal corporate tax rate from 35% to 21% will save the Atlanta-based utility $106 million, resulting in a credit of about $22 in February for the average residential customer.

“Over the past two years, Georgia Power has passed on the benefits from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act through direct credits on customers’ bills,” Kevin Kastner, vice president of customer services for Georgia Power, said Tuesday in a prepared statement. “This final bill credit fulfills that commitment.”

The three bill credits totaling nearly $330 million were approved in March 2018 as part of an agreement with the state Public Service Commission’s staff. The first credit was issued in October 2018, and the second credit was applied last June.