Safety solutions company to build plant in Cobb County

ATLANTA – A leading safety technology solutions company will invest about $10 million in a new manufacturing plant in Smyrna, Gov. Brian Kemp announced Wednesday.

Georgia-based Flock Safety’s new facility will create 210 jobs during the next three years.

“In Georgia, we foster a business environment where innovative companies can get off the ground and grow into leaders in their industry while operating in safe communities,” Kemp said. “Flock Safety is a great example of the success that approach has created, and we’re proud to celebrate this milestone with them.”

Flock Safety was founded in Georgia in 2017 and currently supports more than 250 jobs in the state. More than 300 law enforcement agencies and 100 businesses in Georgia have deployed Flock Safety’s technology to reduce crime.

The company launched its Drone as First Responder system last year upon acquiring Aerodome, a leader in rapid response drones for public safety.

“We feel fortunate to have our roots in Georgia, the state that is undisputedly the leader in the American aerospace industry, and are proud to invest further by creating hundreds of advanced manufacturing and aviation jobs locally,” said Garrett Langley, Flock Safety’s founder and CEO. “Drone as First Responder technology stands to transform emergency response, and these made-in-America … drones will have a transformative impact on the local communities we aim to serve.”

The company has begun hiring for jobs at the new plant and expects to begin full operations in 2027. Interested individuals can learn more about working at Flock Safety and apply at www.flocksafety.com/careers.

The Georgia Department of Economic Development’s Global Commerce team worked on the project in partnership with the city of Smyrna, the Cobb County Economic Development office, the Metro Atlanta Chamber, Georgia Power, and SelectCobb, a public-private partnership for economic development.

As Georgia legislative session winds down, advocates press for vote on religious liberty bill

ATLANTA – Proponents of religious freedom gathered in the Georgia Capitol Tuesday to pressure the state House of Representatives to vote on a measure that would limit government intrusion into actions based on religious beliefs.

Opponents say religious rights are not under attack and that Senate Bill 36 would make it legal to discriminate against people under the banner of faith.

Proponents say religious freedom has been seriously infringed in other states and could be a problem in the future in Georgia. They have cited two cases in this state — one involving a student who wanted to hand out religious literature on a college campus and another involving a college counselor who was disciplined for asserting that her religious rights were compromised by having to advise LGBTQ students.

The Senate passed SB 36 along party lines in March. A committee of the House of Representatives then passed it, over the opposition of Democrats and one Republican.

The legislation has not come up for a vote on the floor of the House, and the 2025 legislative session ends Friday.

“It’s time to move, now,” W. Thomas Hammond, Jr., executive director of the Georgia Baptist Mission Board, said Tuesday, with supporters arrayed behind him on the marble steps of the state Capitol.

The bill is being sponsored by Sen. Ed Setzler, R-Acworth, who said Georgia should join 39 other states with a Religious Freedom Restoration Act.

“We’re the only Republican-led state in the nation that does not have this protection,” Setzler said after Hammond spoke.

Critics of SB 36, including fellow Republican Rep. Deborah Silcox from Sandy Springs, have noted that Georgia is one of a few states lacking a comprehensive civil rights law that protects against discrimination in public spaces, workplaces or housing.

The federal Civil Rights Act prohibits discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex or national origin. Many states have expanded civil rights protections to also prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation, gender identity or both.

Eighteen cities and counties in Georgia have non-discrimination ordinances. Silcox and Democrats said SB 36 would pre-empt such local laws, and they pushed for language in Setzler’s bill they said would counterbalance religious interest.

Setzler opposed the amendment, saying SB 36 would not override local non-discrimination ordinances and that establishing a statewide non-discrimination law was a separate policy discussion.

Setzler explained Tuesday that he also opposed the amendment because the non-discrimination language was a “Trojan horse” that would “exempt” the religious protections in SB 36. If someone were to raise a non-discrimination claim, he said, the religious freedom protections wouldn’t apply if Silcox’s language had been added.

SB 36 seeks to prohibit government intrusion into the exercise of religion except in cases involving a “compelling government interest.”

Silcox’s amendment would have added that the government’s interest includes “protecting persons against discrimination on any ground prohibited by federal, state or local law.”

On Tuesday, Rep. Stacey Evans, D-Atlanta, refuted Setzler’s assertion. In an interview after he spoke, Evans, who had voted for the Silcox amendment, said religious freedom protections can co-exist with protections against discrimination against LGBTQ+ people.

“If Senator Setzler was not interested in using this RFRA bill to discriminate against Georgians,” she said, “he would have no problem with an anti-discrimination amendment to the bill.”

At this point, it is up to the House Rules Committee to decide whether to put SB 36 to a vote of the whole House. Should the committee withhold the bill when the House gavels to order on Wednesday and Friday, it would remain in play when lawmakers return next year, but it would be sidelined for the remainder of this year.

Asked for comment about the pressure campaign to bring SB 36 to a vote, a spokesperson for House Speaker Jon Burns, a Republican from Newington, texted this statement:

“There are several issues that the House will consider over the next two legislative days, and as always, we’ll focus on prioritizing policies that matter most to our fellow Georgians.”

Georgia House panel OKs bill denying state coverage of gender-affirming care

ATLANTA – Republican-backed legislation denying coverage of gender-affirming health care though the State Health Benefit Plan (SHBP) advanced in the Georgia House of Representatives Tuesday.

The House Health Committee approved a bill that originated in the state Senate and passed that legislative chamber in February.

The House panel added a provision to Senate Bill 39 that would extend the denial of coverage beyond employees of state agencies, public schools, the University System of Georgia and the Technical College System of Georgia to also apply to state prison inmates.

The legislation defines gender-affirming care to include hormone therapy and sex reassignment surgery. It would also ban state-owned health-care facilities and physicians who work for the state from providing such care.

“There’s many places within health insurance where certain surgeries or procedures aren’t covered,” Rep. Brent Cox, R-Dawsonville, who is carrying the bill in the House, told committee members Tuesday. “Certain things we have to pay for out of our own pocket. … This is to be responsible with the funds we have.”

Legislative Democrats have argued the bill is part of a broader Republican agenda attacking Georgia’s transgender community for political gain.

Democrats on the committee pointed to a series of lawsuits over coverage of gender-affirming care for state employees the state has lost or settled going back to 2015. Plaintiffs have successfully challenged those denials as a violation of the U.S. Constitution’s equal-protection clause.

“These types of laws have been overturned by the judicial branch in multiple states,” said Rep. Jasmine Clark, D-Lilburn. “How are we saving money for the state if we’re having to spend more money in litigation?”

Rep. Trey Kelley, R-Cedartown, said the state has lost those lawsuits because there’s no state law on the books addressing the issue.

“This will correct that problem and help avoid litigation,” he said.

Dr. Cassie Ackerley of Atlanta objected to the provision extending the bill to prison inmates. She said inmates who in some cases have been receiving hormone therapy for years would be suddenly cut off.

“You’re forcing a person to de-transition while incarcerated,” she said. “That’s cruel and egregious.”

Republicans on the committee defeated an amendment Clark proposed to allow Georgians already enrolled in the SHBP to continue receiving coverage for gender-affirming care, then passed the underlying bill along party lines.

The legislation heads next to the House Rules Committee to schedule a floor vote on one of the final two days remaining in this year’s General Assembly session.

Legislature passes bill to compost corpses

ATLANTA – Legislation that would regulate an alternative method for disposal of the dead is on its way to Gov. Brian Kemp.

The Georgia House of Representatives on Monday adopted Senate Bill 241 by a vote of 157-4. The Senate had already approved the bill in a near unanimous vote in early March.

SB 241 was brought to the legislature by Sen. Rick Williams, R-Milledgeville, who is in the funeral home business.

“It’s just human composting,” he explained in a hearing about the measure several weeks ago, a hearing that was ripe with quips about the “Breaking Bad” bill and a 1950s song called “Dry Bones.”

But Williams said his measure was important for community safety and for the dignity of the deceased. He referenced a recent case in Colorado where remains were not properly disposed of, creating a health hazard.

Williams said properly composted corpses produced safe and hygienic soil that could be returned to families to use as they choose, including in the garden.

Federal judge sides with Georgia in ‘water wars’ with Alabama

ATLANTA – The state of Georgia has won another legal case in its long-running “water wars” with Florida and Alabama.

A federal judge Monday sided with Georgia, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the Atlanta Regional Commission (ARC), and the Cobb County-Marietta Water Authority in a dispute over allocation of water from Lake Allatoona.

The decision upheld the Corps’ decision in 2021 to grant Metro Atlanta’s water supply requests from the lake and allocate more of the reservoir to meet the long-term needs of Cartersville and Bartow County. The state of Alabama had challenged the federal agency’s decision, arguing it would allocate too much water from the Alabama-Coosa-Tallapoosa (ACT) River Basin to Georgia.

“Backed by thorough analysis, factfinding, and experience, the Corps determined that granting Georgia’s water-supply request would have little, if any, effect” on Alabama’s water needs, U.S. District Judge Loren AliKhan wrote in a 38-page decision. “The record is replete with evidence showing negligible or non-significant impacts.”

Danny Johnson, managing director of natural resources at the ARC, praised the ruling.

“We are pleased to have a final decision that brings long-awaited certainty to all ACT stakeholders after decades of litigation,” he said. “This ruling affirms our communities’ responsible management and investment in water resources. We look forward to collaboration with all of the stakeholders in our shared river basins to address water challenges together.”

In Georgia’s other long-running water wars battle with the state of Florida, the U.S. Supreme Court also sided with Georgia, ruling in 2021 that Florida failed to prove its allegations that Georgia’s water consumption from the Chattahoochee and Flint river systems caused the failure of Florida’s oyster industry in Apalachicola Bay.

Representatives of water supply systems in Gwinnett, Forsyth and Hall counties finalized an agreement with the state of Georgia the following year guaranteeing them water from Lake Lanier through 2050.