by Ty Tagami | Mar 28, 2025 | Capitol Beat News Service
ATLANTA – In a last-minute legislative maneuver, Georgia Senate Republicans have revived a measure that seeks to ban diversity, equity, and inclusion programs in the state’s schools and colleges.
These programs, known by the acronym DEI, were well-intentioned but have been abused, said Sen. Max Burns, R-Sylvania, the author of Senate Bill 120 to ban such programs.
His bill stalled in the House of Representatives, so Burns and fellow Senate Republicans stripped House legislation that had passed to the chamber and replaced it with Burns’ measure Thursday evening.
The Senate Education and Youth Committee then passed House Bill 127, which had been aimed at increasing the number of sick days that teachers can take.
Instead, HB 127 would now withhold state funding from public schools with DEI programs and withhold state funding or state-administered federal funding — including scholarships, loans and grants — from colleges with such programs.
Sen. Greg Dolezal, R-Cumming, said DEI has morphed into “neo-Marxist” ideology that has “infected” the University of Georgia and Georgia Tech. It “squelches” academic freedom, he said,
The legislation targets terms such as “allyship,” “cultural appropriation,” “gender ideology,” “heteronormativity,” “implicit bias,” “intersectionality” and “racial privilege.”
It also targets “antiracism,” a term popularized by the author Ibram X. Kendi in the book “How to be an Antiracist” first published in 2019.
Democrats on the committee pushed back, especially against the idea of punishing schools for teaching antiracism. “So you think we should have a position in support of racism?” asked Sen. RaShaun Kemp, D-Atlanta, who is Black.
Burns, who is white, responded that he believes everyone should have “equal opportunities.” But he accepted an amendment by Kemp to ban the proper noun “Antiracism” rather than the lower-cased “antiracism.”
The amended HB 127 passed the Senate’s education committee in a vote along partisan lines. This was the last meeting of the committee in this legislative session and thus a last opportunity to alter a bill in this manner, though there is still time to make major amendments in the Senate Rules Committee, where this bill is now headed, or on the Senate floor, where the Rules Committee might send it.
For a DEI ban to become law, HB 127 would have to pass the Senate, and then the House would have to agree to the amendments.
The original author of HB 127, Rep. Brent Cox, R-Dawsonville, did not welcome the gutting of his bill, so the House might not appreciate the Senate’s changes.
by Ty Tagami | Mar 27, 2025 | Capitol Beat News Service
ATLANTA – A sweeping school safety bill in reaction to the mass shooting at Apalachee High School last fall cleared a Senate committee Thursday, keeping it in play just ahead of the deadline for final passage this year.
The Georgia House of Representatives had already approved House Bill 268 with broad bipartisan support. Now, the measure, a priority for House Speaker Jon Burns, R-Newington, is eligible for a vote by the full Senate before this legislative session ends next week.
The Senate Judiciary Committee amended the bill Thursday evening, trimming it to 57 pages from the plump 65 that had come from the House in early March.
It still covers a lot of the same ground though, maintaining the focus on the early identification of potentially harmful students and intervening with mental health services.
School shooters are “really sociopathic-type personalities most of the time,” said Sen. Bill Cowsert, R-Athens, who shepherded HB 268 through the Senate and said he worked with the House on the amendments.
Cowsert’s team sanded away a couple of features that had drawn the most criticism.
The first involved a database that would have served as a repository of information about students who seemed suspicious. One state official said it might contain records on 1% of Georgia’s 1.7 million public school students. Parents and their advocates feared such data would be inaccurate, prejudicial and stigmatizing — and follow students into adulthood, with potentially harmful consequences.
Given the trajectory of brain development into early adulthood, teens tend toward reckless behavior, they noted, and sometimes say inappropriate things they don’t really mean.
The committee deleted the database idea and also struck a provision requiring school systems to establish threat assessment teams. Some schools already have them, but a mandate was deemed to be too complex and cumbersome, Cowsert said.
Other major elements of the House bill remain.
Schools would have to maintain student records on behavior that sends up red flags, from regularly skipping school to disciplinary infractions and police encounters (police would have to inform the schools when they apprehend their students), and they’d have a short deadline to share those records when a student transfers to a different school.
“That will help the new administration know what to do when a new kid comes there,” Cowsert said.
School districts would also have to maintain an around-the-clock anonymous tip line staffed with trained people who can field reports about students who might be planning a violent act.
The help would come in the form of specially trained student advocates. Each school system would get up to three state-funded positions, one for every 18,000 students.
There would also be annual behavioral training for teachers and students about recognizing mental health warning signs such as contemplating suicide.
Finally, HB 268 would treat teens sternly if they threaten violence on campus, sending them into adult courts if they are charged with attempted murder or terroristic threats.
That means a conviction for a bomb threat would tag a child aged 13-17 with a misdemeanor on their permanent record, with a felony punishable by up to five years in prison for a second offense.
“Zero tolerance,” is how Cowsert characterized the approach, prompting questions from Sen. Elena Parent of Atlanta, the chair of the Senate’s Democratic Caucus.
But she also said she had received many pleased emails about the bill, and the committee then passed it unanimously, less than a day ahead of the deadline to keep it in play.
HB 268 now goes to the Senate Rules Committee, which will decide whether and when to put it to a vote of the full Senate. If it passes there, the House would need to agree to the changes for it to become law.
by Ty Tagami | Mar 27, 2025 | Capitol Beat News Service
ATLANTA – The Georgia Senate’s Republican majority voted along party lines Thursday to investigate groups founded by former Democratic gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams after they agreed to pay the largest campaign finance fine in state history.
The New Georgia Project and a separate fundraising arm, the New Georgia Action Fund, agreed to pay $300,000 for failing to disclose $4.2 million in contributions and $3.2 million in spending during the 2018 election cycle on behalf of Abrams’ unsuccessful bid for governor.
A special committee of the Georgia Senate that has been investigating Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis will now be empowered to expand its work to include Abrams.
The committee can administer oaths, call witnesses, require production of documents and issue subpoenas.
Sen. Bill Cowsert, R-Athens, the chairman of that committee, said the expanded mission is needed “to keep the dark money out of our political campaigns.”
Democrats have called the committee political grandstanding.
The Senate should be focused on access to affordable medical care and public education instead of “wasting” taxpayer dollars on this investigation, said Sen. Jason Esteves, D-Atlanta.
“When I read bills like this, all I can do is shake my head because this is a glaring example of hypocrisy in this building,” he said. “Do as I say, not as I do.”
Senate Resolution 292 to expand the authority of the Special Committee on Investigations passed 33-21 along party lines.
The committee was created last year in the wake of Republican anger over Willis’ criminal case against President Donald Trump and others who helped his effort to overturn the 2020 presidential election in Georgia.
by Ty Tagami | Mar 27, 2025 | Capitol Beat News Service
ATLANTA – Women who are finding it difficult to get pregnant are one step closer to guaranteed access in Georgia to a medical procedure that assists with conception after the state Senate overwhelmingly approved the legality of it Thursday.
House Bill 428 was prompted by an Alabama Supreme Court ruling last year that declared frozen embryos created through in vitro fertilization (IVF) should be treated as children. The decision essentially banned the procedure in that state until Alabama lawmakers passed a bill protecting IVF.
Georgia House Speaker Jon Burns, R-Newington, has made codifying IVF protections into Georgia law a priority for this year’s General Assembly session.
The Senate voted 53-1 to pass HB 428, but the measure must return to the House for final adoption due to Senate amendments.
The bill defines the IVF procedure and explicitly says that nothing in Georgia law should be construed to prohibit or prevent people from access.
“It serves a great purpose,” said Sen. Ben Watson, R-Savannah, who noted that the bill’s chief sponsor, Rep. Lehman Franklin, R-Statesboro, tried for 14 years with his wife to have a child. They finally succeeded through IVF and are expecting the baby’s arrival by June.
Sen. Josh McLaurin, D-Sandy Springs, said the Senate amendments strengthened the bill.
“I think it does what it’s intended to accomplish and it’s going to protect people like me and families like mine,” said McLaurin, who said he himself was “donor conceived” in the late 1980s.
by Ty Tagami | Mar 26, 2025 | Capitol Beat News Service
Parents of children who are questioning their gender would still have access in Georgia to medicine that prevents the onset of puberty under a new version of state legislation that had sought to ban all access.
The version of Senate Bill 30 that passed the Georgia Senate in early March would have threatened the medical licenses of doctors and hospitals administering puberty blockers.
Sen. Ben Watson, R-Savannah, the bill’s chief sponsor, said the prohibition was needed because of long-term repercussions, such as bone density loss. He pointed to some European countries that have banned access.
But a fellow Republican in the House of Representatives said Wednesday that the Senate’s bill went too far, and she reined it in with what she called a compromise. Rep. Sharon Cooper, R-Marietta, chairs the House Public and Community Health Committee, where the bill was sent by House leadership. Her amendment preserves access to puberty blockers but makes them harder to obtain.
The committee hearing featured medical specialists who testified for and against a ban, with one pediatric endocrinologist saying that delaying puberty is harmful and another dismissing the consequences of puberty blockers.
“Physiologically these bodies are male, and they are female,” said Dr. Quentin Van Meter, who testified to the committee via Watson’s phone. “There’s nothing that we can do that can change that at any cellular level and so puberty blockers are inappropriate for the use in these kids before the age of consent,” he said.
Delaying puberty reduces bone density and can cause problems with “mental capabilities,” he said without elaborating.
Dr. Shirley Hao said she was speaking for the Georgia Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics, and that the organization opposes banning puberty blockers.
“Treatment of gender dysphoria and gender affirming care is supported by nearly every major medical and mental health organization in the United States,” she said, “including the American Medical Association, the American Psychological Association, the American Psychiatric Association, the American Academy of Pediatrics and the Endocrine Society, just to name a few.”
Hao said studies have shown that bone density can be addressed by the later use of hormone therapy and by increased vitamin D intake, calcium supplementation and physical activity.
Several who spoke at the hearing noted a disconnect between Georgia Republicans’ goal of safeguarding parental rights and how Watson and other proponents of SB 30 want to deny those rights when it comes to puberty blockers.
Cooper appeared to agree with the critique.
“I think a lot of us are just having some trouble about that sort of dictatorial writ,” she said, before outlining how her amendments would alter SB 30 by allowing continued access to puberty blockers but making them “really hard to get.”
Parents would have to get two behavioral health specialists — either two psychiatrists, or a psychiatrist and a psychologist — to determine that their child has gender dysphoria. Then they would have to see a board-certified pediatric endocrinologist.
These sorts of specialists are rare, Cooper noted.
“A parent is going to have to really want and understand and believe their child has this dysphoria because a lot of them are probably going to have to drive 100 or 150 miles to get to that kind of doctor,” she said.
Cooper’s amendment didn’t placate Democrats. All eight Democrats present voted against the bill, after their caucus vice chair, Rep. Spencer Frye from Athens, railed against SB 30 as a “disgusting” waste of time.
But the committee passed the bill with the support of eight Republicans.
The House Rules Committee will now decide whether to put it to a vote of the full House. If it were to pass there, the Senate would have to agree to Wednesday’s amendments for it to become law.
